03 · Traceability Chain

Traceability Chain

From adversary to audit question — the analytical spine of the framework.

Filter by layer
T-01
L1
Actor
State actor
Vector
GNSS spoofing
Component
GNSS receiver / INS
Effect
Off-course navigation, mission abort
Audit question
Spoofing detection & alt-nav failover proven?C-1.1
Why it matters
Related control · C-1.1
GNSS spoofing resilience

GNSS receivers can be tricked by counterfeit satellite signals broadcast from nearby transmitters, causing the platform to believe it is in a different place or time. A resilient design detects anomalies (signal strength, RAIM, multi-constellation cross-check) and falls back to inertial navigation (INS) or alternative sources without aborting the mission silently.

T-02
L1
Actor
Proxy group
Vector
C2 link hijack
Component
OCS / radio link
Effect
Unauthorised control of USV
Audit question
Mutual auth + key rotation enforced?C-1.2
Why it matters
Related control · C-1.2
C2/OCS link authentication

The command-and-control link is the most direct path to take over a USV. Mutual authentication (both sides prove identity), replay protection (recorded packets cannot be reused), and scheduled key rotation prevent hijack even if an attacker records traffic for later attack.

T-03
L2
Actor
Insider
Vector
Sensor data tampering
Component
Sonar / EM sensor
Effect
False mine clearance reports
Audit question
Per-frame signing and attestation?C-2.1
Why it matters
Related control · C-2.1
Sensor data integrity

Sweep results and contact reports drive operational decisions; a forged sonar frame could falsely declare an area clear. Cryptographically binding sensor frames to the originating device (signed at the sensor, verified at the consumer) prevents in-line tampering.

T-04
L3
Actor
Vendor compromise
Vector
Malicious firmware update
Component
MCU / FPGA firmware
Effect
Persistent backdoor
Audit question
Signed updates + SBOM verified?C-3.2
Why it matters
Related control · C-3.2
Signed update chain

Every firmware/software update must be cryptographically signed by a controlled key, and the device must verify the signature before accepting it. This blocks the classic 'malicious update' supply chain attack — the highest-impact path into deployed equipment.

T-05
L3
Actor
Upstream open-source compromise
Vector
Dependency injection
Component
Autonomy stack libraries
Effect
Decision logic corruption
Audit question
Pinned, reviewed, reproducible builds?C-3.4
Why it matters
Related control · C-3.4
Toolchain integrity

If the build toolchain (compiler, linker, signing tools) is tampered with, every binary it produces is suspect — the classic Ken Thompson attack. Reproducible builds let independent parties verify that source code maps deterministically to the released binary.

T-06
L4
Actor
Any adversary
Vector
Slow data exfiltration
Component
Telemetry pipeline
Effect
Operational intelligence leak
Audit question
SOC anomaly detection in place?C-4.1
Why it matters
Related control · C-4.1
Telemetry to SOC

Without telemetry there is no monitoring. The SOC must receive signed (tamper-evident) operational and security telemetry, and must be staffed and tooled for OT analysis — IT-only SOCs miss protocol-level and physical-process anomalies entirely.

T-07
L5
Actor
Hostile jurisdiction
Vector
Forced vendor non-cooperation
Component
Critical sub-supplier
Effect
Loss of patch capability
Audit question
Right-to-patch + escrow enforceable?C-5.4
Why it matters
Related control · C-5.4
Right to patch & re-flash

If only the original vendor can sign firmware, and that vendor disappears or refuses to patch a vulnerability, the buyer is stuck. Source escrow plus custody of signing keys (or a co-signing arrangement) preserves the buyer's ability to patch.